Audio Interview, Bill Giancursio, April 27, 2012
- BILL GIANCURSIO: But I'm afraid I don't have a lot to add.
- I wasn't on the Empty Closet for a very long time.
- EVELYN BAILEY: But do you recall where it was before Jim's?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: You know, I was trying to remember that.
- And for some reason, I just draw a blank.
- Didn't you just interview Tim?
- EVELYN BAILEY: Well, it was at Jay Baker's for a while.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Tim was already the editor when
- I worked for the Empty Closet.
- And I think Joe Baker had it in his own private residence
- up to that point.
- But it seems to me there was some intermediary place
- for a while before we moved to Jim's.
- But I'm drawing a blank.
- EVELYN BAILEY: It went from the U of R
- to Brown Street to Joe Baker.
- And when it left Joe Baker's, I thought--
- I'm going to have to go back.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: I think I remember Tim saying something
- about an old empty warehouse.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Oh, that's right,
- the warehouse on University.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: Yeah, it was on University
- BILL GIANCURSIO: But yes, that's right.
- That's where I started working.
- I'm having trouble remembering if it was the warehouse first,
- and then Jim's.
- I think it was the warehouse first, and then Jim's.
- And then from Jim's, it went to Monroe Avenue, upstairs.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Right, the Genesee Co-op.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, no, actually not
- even the Genesee Co-op.
- There was another place in between--
- Upper Monroe.
- It was in a building upstairs.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Oh, Friar's?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, it might have been.
- It was that--
- EVELYN BAILEY: Because Friar's is where Woody's is now.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yes, I believe it was.
- I wasn't involved at that point.
- I was just doing ads and dropping them off.
- Deb Drexler was the Art Director at that point.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Alright.
- Talk to me about Deb Drexler.
- Who is she?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: She's a lesbian.
- She got the CETA job.
- Did Tim ever talk about the CETA job?
- EVELYN BAILEY: No.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: There was a CETA job.
- And you know, I'm not even straight on how this all
- worked out.
- EVELYN BAILEY: The second year of the funding.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: It was the government funding that was
- set aside for the Empty Closet.
- There were three positions.
- One of them was artist.
- And I was in line for the job.
- But what happened is, it got hung up
- in bureaucratic garbage somebody didn't
- like distributing the funds.
- The Chamber of Commerce wound up taking it over.
- EVELYN BAILEY: That was the first year.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: And I couldn't wait.
- I needed a job, so I went to work for the city school
- district.
- And Deb Drexler got the job.
- She took it on for a whole year.
- So she followed me as artist.
- And I don't know where she is these days.
- She just moved away.
- EVELYN BAILEY: So you were the graphic artist before her?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yes.
- Yeah, for not quite a year-- probably closer to nine months.
- I think I started in March, and ran
- through the rest of the year.
- And then after that, I just did some ads for assorted people.
- And I worked on production a little bit,
- but probably only a year is all I worked on the paper.
- I went through some of the issues to refresh my memory,
- because it was a long time ago.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Now, were you involved with the Alliance,
- other than being the artist for the EC?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Not really.
- I didn't hold any positions or anything like that.
- I knew people on the Alliance.
- It actually wasn't the Alliance at that point.
- It was the Lesbian Resource Center and the Gay Brotherhood
- that made up--
- and it later became the Gay Alliance of the Genesee Valley.
- But when it moved into the Genesee Co-op,
- and they tried to unify everybody,
- including the newspaper-- at least that's my recollection.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Right, that was in 1973.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Was it that early?
- EVELYN BAILEY: Yes.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, I don't have my newspapers
- in front of me.
- I thought it was 1976 when I actually
- worked for the newspaper.
- Because the bicentennial was in 1976.
- And my last cover for the Empty Closet
- was "Bye Bye Bicentennial", which was 1976.
- EVELYN BAILEY: So they were already at the Co-op.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: I think they may have been.
- I know that we worked on University Avenue
- in the cage for a while--
- for several months.
- EVELYN BAILEY: In the cage?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: It was in the basement,
- over that gigantic industrial building on the corner
- of University and Culver.
- And in the basement was a caged-off area.
- That's all I can tell you.
- It was just a cage.
- It was a big area, but it was all--
- and we worked in a cage.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Who connected you to the EC?
- How did you get involved?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: It's a romantic story,
- if you want to know the truth.
- And it's kind of interesting, because I was just coming out
- of that time, in 1976.
- Maybe a little bit earlier, '75 I started to come out.
- And I was going to bars and stuff.
- And I just wasn't meeting the right kind of people
- that I wanted to meet.
- It was just all very superficial.
- And I thought, well, there has to be some substance somewhere.
- And so I thought that I would get involved
- in more political things.
- Like, I met Michael Robertson, who was the president of--
- well, it was the Gay Brotherhood,
- but it also may have been considered the Gay Alliance
- as well back then.
- And I met Tim at that time too.
- And I was kind of interested in Tim,
- so I started working for the Closet, as a way--
- EVELYN BAILEY: Tim Mains?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yeah, getting to know Tim.
- And getting to know other people, which I did.
- And it just became much more--
- a greater opportunity for social interaction.
- As opposed to the bar, where everyone got drunk--
- well, you know the dynamics of that.
- Because there weren't a lot of outlets available to us.
- You went to the bar to meet people,
- or you didn't meet anybody.
- And so you had to just kind of go
- through that sort of meat-rack syndrome,
- that was just really horrendous back in those days.
- Well, for some people-- some people loved it.
- But there weren't a lot of places to meet people.
- And so social organizations like the Gay Alliance
- and the Empty Closet were opportunities.
- And there was a great social network too.
- I mean, just among the men and the women.
- We would have production meetings--
- decide what the theme was for the paper for that month.
- We'd meet like we are here, around a big table,
- or in someone's living room.
- And sit and talk about what the theme was going to be,
- and who was going to handle what stories and stuff.
- We didn't have a lot of actual people working for the paper.
- A lot of it was borrowed from other sources.
- And that was our biggest problem,
- was getting reporters who could do local stories
- and stuff like that.
- A lot of it was composites from here and there.
- And so it took a while for it really
- to get the point where it is right now,
- which is we've got a whole staff of writers and people involved.
- But there wasn't a lot of that.
- And so somebody would take responsibility
- for the lead story, whatever it was.
- And just kind of do whatever they could to kind of pull it
- all together.
- But it was really very, very elementary by comparisons.
- It was all done on a typewriter.
- Later on, we went to typesetting,
- but initially it was all typed in columns on a typewriter.
- And pasted-- in the old-fashioned way of doing
- things--
- that kind of cut and paste.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Are you from Rochester?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yes.
- EVELYN BAILEY: So you were born and raised here?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yep.
- EVELYN BAILEY: In what area of the city?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: I lived over--
- Broad Street, Smith Street, Grape Street-- that area.
- Dutchtown, I guess.
- I'm not sure if it exactly was Dutchtown,
- but it was close to that.
- EVELYN BAILEY: When did you begin, Bill,
- to recognize, or sense within yourself that you were gay?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, growing up, I was an artist.
- So I was always kind of a sensitive kid anyway.
- And there was always something a little peculiar about me.
- At least, I thought there was.
- I just always felt a little alienated and different.
- I don't know that I really classified it in my own mind
- as being gay, until maybe I went to college.
- Because I had been in the military prior to that--
- in 1966 to '68--
- so I really didn't think of myself
- as being gay at that time.
- Or I would have got out of the Army during the Vietnam era.
- But I think shortly after getting out, and going
- to college--
- I started with the GI Bill.
- I went to college, and started to meet other people.
- And just kind of, like, met some gay people at college.
- And sort of made that gradual transition to,
- maybe I'm bisexual.
- I think the way I approached it was, I said,
- you know what, I don't know.
- I have feelings for guys, and I'm also dating women.
- So I'm not quite sure where I stand,
- but I'm going to just give myself
- a two-year period to kind of experiment with my sexuality.
- Because, you know, during the '70s everybody
- was doing that anyway.
- It was sort of the generation to get stoned, and do
- what you wanted to do.
- So everything was very liberated at that point.
- And so I just sort of took a couple of years
- and experimented.
- And I said, after two years, I'll
- assess whether or not I'm gay.
- And of course, I never looked back, so. (Laughs)
- KEVIN INDOVINO: Did it really take you two years?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, I don't think it did.
- But I sort of set that as a deadline.
- And then two years later, I said, well,
- we have to come back and decide.
- And I said, well, there's no deciding.
- I mean, this feels natural.
- This feels right to me.
- And this is kind of what I've been maybe struggling
- with all my life, on some level, and just not really aware
- of it.
- I mean, I clearly avoided a lot of intimate interactions
- with women, because I sort of knew that it wasn't where
- I wanted to go on some level.
- So being with men just seemed more natural to me,
- more comfortable for me.
- And I don't ever think of it--
- I never thought of it in a sexual context, initially.
- It just felt like I was more comfortable in the presence
- of men than I was with women.
- Or at least that's where I wanted to be.
- That's what I felt was missing from my life.
- And you know, I think that sort of came from childhood.
- Because my father died when I was six years old,
- and my mother moved home with her mother and her mother's
- sister.
- So I was pretty much raised in a female household.
- So that sort of, like, male connection
- was kind of missing from me.
- And there was sort of that desire, or curiosity,
- or necessity to sort of find the maleness in me,
- or find that sort of equivalency, whatever.
- So I just naturally moved in that direction,
- and just never looked back.
- Thought, yeah, that's right.
- The interesting thing is, Tim, who I initially
- joined the paper for, and I became very best friends
- for many years.
- And eighteen years later at a fundraiser for Tim,
- I met Tom, my husband of eighteen years.
- So it was kind of full circle.
- Eventually it paid off--
- the social aspects of it--
- which is kind of amusing.
- But that's my story.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Where did you go to college?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: RIT and MCC.
- I started at MCC.
- MCC is actually where I started to come out.
- I met someone in one of my psychology classes who was gay.
- And we just kind of became friends.
- And I met him and his partner.
- And I would have dinner there.
- And you know, just kind of like getting my feet wet,
- and feeling comfortable around it.
- And so yeah, that's where it started for me.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Where did you meet Tim?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Tim I met working on the Empty Closet.
- EVELYN BAILEY: But how did you find him?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: I knew he was the Editor of the Empty Closet,
- because I would read the paper.
- Actually it was a little confusing,
- because I had him confused with somebody else.
- I knew that he worked for the Empty Closet.
- And so I thought, well, if I want to get to know him better,
- and kind of get to be more sociable with other people,
- I would go to work and bring my skills.
- Because they always needed volunteers back then.
- I mean, the paper was desperate for people to do stuff.
- EVELYN BAILEY: When you were in the process of coming out,
- were there other periodicals, other newspapers?
- I mean, what were you finding out there
- to help you with your meanderings?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Books at the library.
- I would go to the library.
- And that little section on homosexuality
- is where I would sort of peruse books.
- Just kind of find things like, Society
- and the Healthy Homosexual, Loving Someone Gay.
- You know, those are all books from way back,
- that dealt with the concept that it's OK to be gay.
- And it's not psycho--
- and the other thing is too, back in college in 1976--
- well, I was actually in college I think in '75.
- It was around '74, '75 when the American Psychiatric
- Association said, it's not a sickness to be gay anymore.
- So we were just kind of coming into that mode, where
- we were of the mind that it was alright to be gay--
- that it wasn't a sickness.
- So up to then, we didn't have any great role models, really,
- to look to--
- other than people who were flamboyantly gay.
- And many of us just didn't identify with that role model.
- And plus, you had society saying, these are sick people.
- It was just not somewhere you wanted to be.
- But reading periodicals-- books mostly.
- The Empty Closet didn't have a large following.
- We used to hand it out at the bars at night.
- I can remember one evening standing
- by the door handing them out.
- Empty Closet, Empty Closet, Empty Closet.
- And some very flamboyant guy took it from me
- and said, "It certainly is empty!"
- And threw it on the floor and walked out.
- It cracked me up.
- It was really very funny.
- I didn't think about it that much, other than the fact
- that it was something very amusing.
- His perspective on it was, that there was really nothing in it.
- It was kind of like, well, gee, maybe
- we really need to put some more effort into this newspaper.
- (Laughs)
- But it met a lot of people's needs, I think.
- I mean, it was important to have something out there,
- other than just Stone.
- Because there wasn't a lot to rely on,
- other than those books.
- And there wasn't a great deal in print.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And was this at Jim's, that you
- were handing out the paper?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yes, it was at Jim's.
- Because on nights when we did distribution--
- when the paper was printed, after the bars at night,
- we'd stand at the door and hand them out
- at 2:00 AM in the morning.
- but we were also working in the basement too, at Jim's.
- Pamie and-- have you interviewed Pamela at all?
- EVELYN BAILEY: Pam Barrale?
- Yes.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yeah, I thought it
- would be kind of interesting to see if you could get some
- of the production staff together-- the old production
- staff-- to sit around and reminisce about the paper.
- It might stimulate ideas among us.
- Because we really were actually--
- and I didn't know how much of this
- you want to know-- the scuttlebutt behind the scenes.
- But we really had a hard time with Tim.
- Tim was just a despot from the very beginning.
- He had worked on the newspaper at Ball State.
- He knew how a newspaper had to be run,
- and everything had to be done Tim's way.
- There was no way, or Tim's way.
- And it got to the point where people wouldn't work
- for the paper, because of Tim.
- Because he was so hard to work for.
- These years later, it has proven that Tim is just
- as difficult to work for.
- I mean, that's off the record, of course.
- But he is a perfectionist, when it comes
- to doing things a certain way.
- And we used to have interventions with Tim.
- Where the staff would sit down, and we'd invite Tim over.
- And we'd all have dinner.
- And then after dinner, we'd sit.
- And we'd say, OK, we have problems.
- We have issues, Tim.
- Things are just not getting done,
- because you're pissing a lot of people off.
- Because everything everybody does, you don't like,
- or you find fault with.
- So people say, well, fuck you, I'm not going to do it.
- I'm just not going to work with you.
- And that really, I think, was a major deterrent
- in getting Tim to lighten up a little bit.
- Because he was just so adamant about having things
- done a certain way--
- this level of perfectionism.
- But that's something we joke a lot about, Pam and I, when
- we get together and talk about how difficult he
- was to work with.
- And Geryllaeyn Naundorf was on the paper too back then.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Geryllaeyn, yeah.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Geryllaeyn was Pam's--
- actually, they had a union.
- They were together for about two years.
- They used to live upstairs from Michael Robertson on Harvard
- in Whitey's building.
- So it was a fun group to hang with.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: Yeah, I just want to kind of explore
- just a little bit more.
- You started talking about it a little bit,
- but describe for me more about the environment
- of being around that table, and putting this paper together.
- And the kind of conversations you guys were having.
- And you know, did you have any sense of what you were really
- doing for the community?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: I think we tried
- to deal with issues that were important.
- Like, we did an issue on rape in Rochester.
- We tried to bring a consciousness, awareness
- to people, about things that we felt needed to be--
- there was really a high level of consciousness
- raising in the production of the newspaper.
- It wasn't just fun and games.
- There was a serious component to it.
- I think we really were trying to bring
- an awareness to the public.
- There really was that sort of serious component
- to putting the paper together.
- But it was difficult to do.
- Because like I said, we didn't have
- a lot of reporters, a lot of people
- who were willing to come out.
- And in fact, we had a few people working
- for the paper using pseudonyms.
- Who just didn't want to be identified, because they
- were in the closet.
- And so the environment was such, that it
- wasn't easy to put out a newspaper locally--
- when you didn't have a lot of local people
- who wanted to be associated with it,
- or wanted to have their names in print.
- So we would sit around, and we would talk about it.
- And we would kind of go down a list of, well,
- who's going to do this?
- And the room would go silent.
- And then finally, somebody would say, "OK, I'll do it."
- And then five minutes later, the same person saying,
- "OK, I'll do it."
- It was always a fragile sort of environment.
- We knew there were things that had to be accomplished.
- But accomplishing them also meant being very much out,
- and being very much visible as being
- connected to the newspaper.
- And that was not an easy thing to do.
- It really wasn't.
- I think there was a time when, in the production
- box on the newspaper, we would just
- have people listed by their first names,
- as staff members who were on production.
- Who worked on production?
- Joe, Pete, Mike, Bill, Mary.
- We just didn't list names.
- And we always had that disclaimer
- in there, that anybody working for the newspaper,
- it wasn't necessarily an indication
- of their sexual orientation.
- Because there was always sort of the fear that--
- you know, it was new.
- The concept of being out was not like it
- is today, where it doesn't make a bit of difference
- in a lot of regards.
- I mean, there were still a lot of fear associated with it.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: Talk to me about some of the graphic work.
- Describe for me what kind of graphic work you were doing.
- And describe for me, maybe, some of your favorite pieces of work
- for a particular story.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, "Bi-bi Bicentennial"
- was one of my favorites.
- I mean, I used to do the cover designs.
- I did them for about a year.
- And we had "Rape in Rochester."
- We had "Gays in Prison."
- I could probably pull up all the covers and show them to you.
- Every year, we had a different theme.
- We had one for the political issue.
- And I would come up with ideas, basically,
- and talk to Tim about what would work.
- Or we would brainstorm about what might be
- an interesting kind of visual.
- And then, I would work up the idea into some kind of visual.
- And I would do the drawings.
- It was basically all drawn by hand.
- The production of the paper was the old way
- of doing things, where you didn't do anything
- with a computer, obviously.
- And in fact, the only thing we did have done,
- was the typesetting, eventually.
- But up to that point, it was just all put together
- piecemeal, in the old way of doing graphics.
- Which was with blue lining on paper, and cutting and pasting.
- And we had margins that we had to adhere to.
- It was old-style production.
- Where the pages would all be lined up,
- and we'd just kind of cut and paste.
- And wax everything, so we could move it around.
- And just fill in here and there with a political cartoon,
- or something.
- I did a few of those.
- But in fact, when I left the paper,
- I went to work for the city school district
- as a graphic designer.
- And I was doing that same sort of stuff
- for the school district, under the CETA
- grant for a whole year.
- And it was the same process, of just putting together
- a newspaper, and a bunch of other periodicals
- and publications that were just all done the hard way, by hand.
- Well, I don't think it was the hard way.
- It was kind of the fun way.
- Now you do all that layout on a computer,
- and it's a much different process.
- But that's how it was done.
- And we worked on a light table, too.
- You had a light table so you could see what was behind you,
- and could do drawings.
- The other thing about production is, any headlines were all
- done with press type.
- You know press type is?
- You buy sheets of--
- and you kind of sit there and rub a letter at a time,
- until you've made the words.
- And so it was all done the old way.
- It took an enormous amount of time to do it, really.
- And we would have production week.
- Where we would all sort of get together
- on that evening, or that week before the newspaper
- had to go to press.
- That's when we would meet in the basement,
- and start to put the paper together.
- And stay up till very late, just working downstairs
- in the cold basement with the rats.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Now, the graphics that you did,
- were they all pencil?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: No, they were done in pen and ink.
- They had to be a high-contrast pen and ink--
- high-contrast black and white.
- Occasionally I would do something in pencil.
- But the reproduction really was a consideration,
- of what would reproduce.
- So it pretty much had to be done in high-contrast
- black and white.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And that was, like, India ink?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yeah.
- EVELYN BAILEY: With pen tips?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yeah, done with pens, paint brushes.
- Sometimes I would just do composite images.
- Like, steal stuff that wasn't copyrighted,
- and we could use that.
- But it had to be stuff that would reproduce.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And then, it was sent to a printer?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yeah.
- EVELYN BAILEY: But before the printer,
- you guys did it yourself, didn't you?
- Or did you always have someone to copy it and print it?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, no, we didn't print the paper.
- We'd put it all together, and then send it off to a printer.
- Who would send us back a proof copy to look at.
- And we would look at that, make corrections, and then send it
- back.
- I want to say Girling--
- EVELYN BAILEY: Was that Bill Girling?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yeah.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Webster Post, Webster Printing.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yeah.
- And eventually, Girling used to do the typesetting, too.
- So yeah, we were not printing the paper.
- We didn't have the means to print it.
- Joe Baker used to print his own.
- I don't know how he did it, on a mimeograph machine or what.
- But we were a little more sophisticated.
- We put all of the sheets together.
- The technical terms for all of these, I've lost.
- I don't remember them anymore.
- Yeah, we would we would put it all together down
- in the basement on light table.
- And then, it would just go to the printer--
- a stack of sheets.
- It's interesting, because I pulled out--
- I have hard copies of the issues that I did.
- And I pulled them out to look through them.
- And my recollection of the paper was
- that it was much bigger and much more substantial
- than it actually was.
- Wow, I mean, I really thought this was something.
- It's just really not a lot-- a few pages.
- It was a step up from just a couple
- of sheets of printed paper.
- But it was certainly a big deal.
- Back then, it was something, and it made a difference.
- I think it did anyway.
- And of course now, it's really quite slick,
- the way it's all put together.
- And it's quite substantial, and there's a lot of stuff in it.
- It's a big paper now, compared to the way it was.
- But humble beginnings.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: Anywhere in this time period,
- do you, or do you know anyone that
- may have any photos of you guys working around the tables,
- putting this thing together?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yes, actually there is an edition.
- And I was looking at it, "The Empty Closet Looks At Itself."
- And I was astonished to find that.
- I have that at home.
- It's one I worked on.
- But it has the whole process of production--
- how we put the paper together.
- You might find that especially useful.
- It was probably in June or July of '76.
- You can find it online.
- And of course, I do have a hard copy of it I can let you take.
- It has pictures of us all down the side,
- putting the paper together.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: Those photos might be there now.
- The original photos might still be down in the archives.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: They probably are.
- EVELYN BAILEY: I'll make another date with you.
- Because we've taken the photos from,
- not only the Empty Closet, but other photos
- that were in the archives, just in boxes.
- And we've had them placed in archival paper,
- and tried to help preserve them.
- But in many instances, we don't know
- who they are, what people they are, where it is.
- And they do go back to the very beginning, practically.
- There's pictures of Whitey.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Whitey took a lot of the pictures.
- He was the photographer.
- So all the pictures of the production staff working,
- Whitey took.
- EVELYN BAILEY: OK.
- But my intention is to have a number of people come here.
- Bring those up and say, OK, let's go through them,
- and try to identify who, where, what was happening.
- But can you maybe talk a little bit more
- about the general environment of Rochester at the time--
- in terms of what it was like to be gay in 1976, 1977.
- You alluded to it, in terms of tremendous fear of being outed.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, just what I was telling you.
- Just w happened with the CETA grant
- was an indication of the homophobia in this community.
- The fact that we got these three positions--
- applied for the grant.
- Tim and-- I don't know who wrote the grant,
- but they were ironclad.
- They were really put together well,
- and we got a grant for those three positions.
- I was talking to Tim about it, and I
- don't remember exactly who was responsible for administering
- the grant money.
- EVELYN BAILEY: In the end, you mean?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: No, initially.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Community Chest.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: The Community Chest, OK.
- And people just were outraged.
- It seems to me it was somebody like Mike MacAluso
- and his Citizens for a Decent Community, who took us to task
- and started to block.
- I'm not sure if it was him.
- EVELYN BAILEY: It was Charlie Schiano.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Charlie Schiano, that's right.
- That's exactly right.
- He was on city council.
- He blocked it.
- And they just were holding up all this money because of it,
- for months.
- And finally, the Community Chest said, well,
- we're not going to touch it.
- We don't want our name associated with this mess.
- So the Chamber of Commerce wound up taking it over.
- EVELYN BAILEY: No, the Urban League took it over--
- Bill Johnson.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: OK.
- I'm not clear on it.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Bill Johnson, the Urban League, and Betty Dwyer
- was hired to go through all the grants and reassign numbers
- and so forth.
- And then when it finally passed, Claire Parker
- was the officer responsible for reporting here.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: There was some issue
- with the Chamber of Commerce and gays.
- I don't know exactly what it was.
- Because years later, in the '80s,
- I was part of the Rochester Gay Men's Chorus.
- And we had a performance in the Chamber of Commerce.
- And it was the first time that the Chamber of Commerce
- allowed a gay-identified organization into the place.
- And it was a big thing.
- We had certain things we could and couldn't do.
- We couldn't wave the banner that we were there,
- because we didn't want to upset the community.
- But they allowed us to go in and have a performance there.
- And we thought that was a major victory for gays,
- because we were allowed to go into the Chamber of Commerce
- and have a performance.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Right.
- The other issue with the chamber was,
- the Alliance wanted to hold its annual dinner
- at the Chamber of Commerce.
- And Tom Mooney was the President of the Chamber,
- and he wouldn't allow it.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Was that--
- EVELYN BAILEY: With Jackie Nunn.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: I don't remember the chronology
- on that.
- That was before?
- EVELYN BAILEY: It would have been early '80s.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: It might have been before the--
- because I think we started to pave the way for acceptance
- again with the Rochester Gay Men's Chorus.
- They let us in, after having denied the--
- EVELYN BAILEY: Yes.
- The Chamber then passed a policy saying,
- no group could hold an annual dinner,
- or have a dinner at the Chamber.
- Did not disallow meetings or other gatherings,
- but no annual meeting dinner, or anything like that.
- And I do recall the Gay Men's Chorus
- appearing at the Chamber, and singing.
- And I think that was after, to try to kind of re-ingratiate
- the Chamber with the community, so that it would not be--
- BILL GIANCURSIO: If you wanted to check that,
- you could talk to Nick Williams about that.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Yeah, we're going to interview Nick.
- He's on our list.
- The CETA funding was particularly negative.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Nasty!
- It was nasty.
- It really was.
- And it just made us aware of the fact that,
- even though we thought the times were changing,
- they weren't changing as fast as we thought they were.
- I have this kind of element of militancy in me these days,
- because when I hear people still struggling
- with the issue of gay rights it just drives me up a wall.
- Because it seems to me, that's something
- I dealt with in the early '70s.
- This is the 21st century, and we're still dealing with this.
- It's like, what the hell is going on?
- It just seems like, this is a long struggle.
- It seems to me, we dealt with this a long time ago.
- But we haven't.
- People just don't evolve at the same level.
- There's always the new people, who have to be educated
- and brought up to speed.
- EVELYN BAILEY: It's a new generation.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: It's a more accepting generation.
- And I don't think the battles are as hard to win.
- But there are still people who are
- very cautious about identifying as gay.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: It's when we became a political weapon.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: It's true.
- It's true.
- Even though it's more culturally acceptable to be gay,
- I think that it's still a big deal.
- It is a big deal.
- I mean, because of the social stigma, not so much.
- But your family-- it's really--
- I don't think any heterosexual family takes delight
- in knowing that their children are gay.
- I don't think that's ever going to change.
- I mean, my mother, who knew my first partner, Bruce,
- for many years--
- when I told her I was gay-- when I finally came out to her,
- she was devastated.
- I said, well, who did you think Bruce was all these years?
- She said, well, I always thought he was gay,
- but I never thought you were.
- We lived together.
- She told me an interesting story about the Empty Closet,
- when Bruce and I were traveling cross-country.
- We took a summer off.
- She walked into my house.
- She used to pick up my mail and drop it off in my house.
- She walked into the house, and she
- saw a copy of the Empty Closet sitting out in the open.
- She picked it up.
- She said, "I put it down and backed out of the house,
- and I wouldn't go back in the house again."
- It was just--
- Yeah, that totally freaked her out.
- And that was it.
- I said, oh geez, I didn't know I left any papers out.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: Fear of the unknown.
- EVELYN BAILEY: You de-gay your apartment, or your home?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, I also assumed
- that they knew, even though it was never made clear
- that this man I lived with was more than just a roommate.
- But denial does strange things to people.
- I've seen it happen in so many instances.
- It's never a good time to really be out.
- You have to forge your own way.
- You have to make it a good time.
- You have to make people who don't
- accept you either accept you or get the hell out of your way.
- You can't cater to them, and you can't bow to their attitudes
- about who you are.
- You have to find your own way.
- And you really do.
- You can't let other people crap all over you because of it.
- And the minute you started thinking
- you're less of a person because of it,
- you're in a bad situation.
- You just can't do that.
- EVELYN BAILEY: In your own life, Bill, have you ever been afraid
- because you were gay?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: I don't know if afraid is the word I would use.
- Probably cautious is a better way.
- I teach at RIT.
- I've taught there for twenty-five years.
- Being a gay instructor has never been
- something that I felt was an element of my personality,
- or my being that I had to bring into the classroom.
- It's not that I felt like I had to hide it,
- but I also was cautious about revealing
- too much about myself.
- It wasn't until many years later--
- like, probably in the last ten years--
- that I've actually not been afraid to talk
- about my husband, or my personal life,
- if it ever got to that point.
- I've always kind of eased around the conversation.
- I would never lie about my self, but I would withhold the truth.
- Essentially they're the same thing,
- depending on how you look at it.
- I don't think I was ever afraid.
- I can't think of any instances where I was ever afraid.
- Cautious, probably, is a better way of thinking about it.
- Guarded-- always on guard.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Did you ever experience
- being physically assaulted by anyone because you were gay?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: No.
- EVELYN BAILEY: I'm thinking about the early days,
- the bars--
- Front Street Bridge.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yeah, that was a little before my time.
- That was the earlier times.
- That was before the stamp of approval
- that we got from the American Psychiatric Association.
- Yeah, Dick's 43 over on Stone Street,
- that was before my time.
- And then, on Washington Square, and the bridge--
- that was also another time of a more homophobic--
- I mean, there were always little components
- where people would drive by and yell "fag" at you,
- or something like that.
- But you know, that was not really physically harmful.
- I never found myself in a situation
- where I was being persecuted because of being gay.
- I've had other elements of homophobia.
- I mean, my artwork is a lot about being gay.
- I've had artwork taken down at RIT because somebody
- was uncomfortable with the homosexual nature of it,
- or content of it.
- I've had that happen a couple of times.
- Just a couple of years ago, the curator of the gallery
- refused to hang a piece of artwork,
- because it had frontal nudity in it.
- And she interpreted it in a negative way,
- and felt it was inappropriate.
- So these sort of things are still there.
- EVELYN BAILEY: But it didn't go any further than that?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, where could it go?
- She had the last say about what went in the gallery.
- And there was a little debate among the teachers,
- as to whether censorship was to be allowed.
- But I think some teachers felt that she
- had no right doing that, and some felt that it's her call.
- So basically, yeah, she won.
- EVELYN BAILEY: But it didn't get to a level
- where you were afraid you might lose
- your position as an instructor?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: No because-- well, you know, not really,
- because I'm an adjunct.
- I'm not really a tenured teacher.
- If anything, I only teach from quarter to quarter at RIT.
- The fact that I get a contract renewal every quarter,
- is just the luck of the draw.
- They recognize my skills, and they keep me on.
- And also, RIT saves a lot of money by hiring adjuncts.
- They don't have to give us benefits,
- and they get quality out of us.
- No, I never was afraid.
- Because for the longest time when I worked there,
- Eric Belman was the chairperson.
- Then, after Eric left, somebody else took over.
- Then, I was a little concerned that could happen.
- But no, the chairperson is a good friend and an ally.
- And she would never--
- she was actually supportive of my work.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: I want to go back a little bit.
- You eventually ended working for the Empty Closet.
- Reason for leaving?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: (Sighs) Dare I say it?
- I just couldn't work with Tim anymore.
- I just reached the point where I just didn't
- want to deal with him anymore.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: What did you do, then, afterwards?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: I actually met my first partner at that point.
- And for seven years, I was just in a relationship.
- And we went out.
- We were social with other gay people, and stuff like that.
- But I just backed away from the political aspects
- of being gay for a while--
- until that relationship broke up.
- And then, I just felt the need for outreach again.
- And that was seven years that Bruce and I were together.
- And so seven years later, is when I joined the Rochester Gay
- Men's Chorus for ten years--
- and was pretty usable in that organization.
- KEVIN INDOVINO: That's '84, '85?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yeah, somewhere through there.
- EVELYN BAILEY: What about police harassment,
- in terms of the police taking down license plate
- numbers outside of bars?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: There was always rumors of that going on.
- We'd be in the bar and hear that was going to happen.
- There was one night I remember in Jim's, when
- the word was spread around that police
- were coming into the bar.
- But you know what, we didn't think really
- that much about it.
- It wasn't the same kind of fear that people experienced
- in the earlier years.
- Where, you know, in Martha's they couldn't touch each other,
- or they couldn't dance together.
- It's like we just said, screw it.
- I mean, this was after Stonewall.
- What are they going to do?
- It was like small potatoes.
- Rochester?
- What do you want to do?
- You want to tie us to a stake and burn us?
- There was an element of militancy
- there, that we just didn't give a shit.
- And I think that that's the kind of pride that was instilled
- in you when you stepped out.
- And you said, you know, I'm not going to just
- hide in the shadows anymore.
- I'm working for the newspaper.
- That's not a big deal, but I have a degree of visibility.
- And it does feed into your self-esteem--
- that you're doing something positive,
- and that makes a difference.
- It's the way it works.
- You take small steps.
- But there's an element of reassurance,
- and forming your self-identity as a gay person, that I think
- is a good thing.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Talk about the Gay Men's Chorus.
- And your feelings about who you were,
- and who you are when you were a part of that group.
- The kinds of things that the Chorus brought
- to the community, gave to the community, instilled
- in its members. (Side conversation with Kevin
- Indovino) What was that like?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Chorus was very interesting.
- It was a lot of fun, first of all.
- And it was also another opportunity
- to elevate your consciousness about being gay.
- I think, in a lot of ways, I had a higher consciousness
- about being gay than many of the members.
- I think a lot of the members were just there
- to play and have fun, and didn't want to think
- about what they were doing.
- I saw a political thread running through the music we did.
- And Nick and I locked horns on occasion
- about things particularly the fun stuff, the stuff
- the Rochettes used to do.
- I would say to him, "I don't think that that's appropriate.
- I honestly don't think that we should present ourselves
- in this way, as men who want to run around in dresses
- and wear wigs."
- And you know, I think Nick had a very shallow consciousness
- about being gay.
- To him it was all camp.
- It was all fun, it was all silliness.
- And I would say, but how is the public perceiving this?
- Because our audience is not entirely gay.
- We have a straight audience.
- And I don't want to stand up there and reinforce
- all of their beliefs about what gays should be.
- In fact, many years later, after I stopped being a member
- of the chorus-- and I stopped because of political
- conflicts--
- I took over as producer for one whole year for the Chorus.
- And did a lot of work, and had a lot
- of trouble getting people to come out and do the real work--
- the sets and the production, just a lot
- of the behind the scenes work.
- And I basically stepped down, because of some issues
- I had with a whole production that we were doing--
- where I didn't feel that women were portrayed
- in the most appropriate manner.
- I thought there was a lack of feminist consciousness
- in what we were doing.
- And I said to Nick, I think this is wrong.
- And the board took it up, and sort of tweaked the program,
- so that we weren't coming off as being anti-feminist.
- But the whole process put me on the defensive.
- And said, OK, I don't want to do this anymore.
- Because you guys just don't get it.
- You really don't.
- You don't understand the difference, the distinction,
- the fine line between doing things properly, and doing them
- inappropriately.
- And so I just didn't want to be a part
- of the organization anymore.
- What I was going to say is, years later, Tom
- and I took Tom's mother to see a Christmas concert
- of the Gay Men's Chorus.
- And it had been probably close to 10 years since I had been--
- because I was with them for 10 solid years.
- And we went, and I don't even think
- Nick was the conductor anymore.
- He may not have been.
- Or maybe he was.
- I just don't remember.
- But the Rochettes came out and did another production number
- of song and dance.
- And the whole Chorus took part in it.
- It was this whole sort of--
- production piece, we used to call them.
- And it was just absurd.
- It was so absurd.
- And Tom's mother was just like--
- she made some comment about it that
- just made me think that the portrayal is just
- such a negative portrayal.
- She was talking about the dresses, and the hair.
- And just stupid things--
- the silliness that they were doing, they thought was fun.
- But it was really having a very negative impact
- on gay identity.
- And I could never get them to understand
- this level of being tasteful in what they were doing,
- and in what they weren't doing.
- They always took the easy way out, and the sort of campy way
- out.
- Anything to put on a dress and a wig.
- I just said, this is bullshit.
- Why do you want your audience to think
- that this is what we want to do, and this is the way we
- want to be perceived.
- We're gay men, and we bring an amazing gift.
- Why do we have to cheapen that by stooping
- to these kinds of levels?
- And so I just found that after a while,
- I didn't think the consciousness of the Chorus
- was high enough for my standards.
- And I didn't want to be a part of it anymore.
- And I still don't.
- I don't go to concerts.
- I'm really just not interested.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Was there any sense,
- though-- when you joined, were, generally,
- the men in the Chorus proud of being gay?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yes, there was a strong group of cohesiveness.
- I mean, the gala concerts that we
- used to do around the country were just spectacular--
- just spectacular.
- There's just nothing that compares
- to that sort of exaltation of being
- a part of that organization, and bringing that gift of music
- to the public.
- The level of excellence, and the amount of work
- that goes into doing that-- and the professionalism--
- is just amazing.
- And especially when you're with all
- of these other performers-- from Seattle,
- and New York City, and San Francisco.
- I mean, this is top-notch stuff.
- These people are not messing around.
- I mean, they sing in Carnegie Hall.
- You know, this is not--
- and so you have this level to rise to.
- Yeah, it was pretty spectacular.
- I went to one gala conference in Minneapolis.
- I think it was one of the first ones--
- maybe it was the second one.
- And that was in '86, I think.
- And that was quite remarkable, quite amazing.
- I think that put Rochester on the face of the map
- for a lot of other people, because of our performance.
- And I had something to do with that too,
- in terms of costuming and stuff.
- And so it was kind of neat to be a part of all of that.
- And yes, the men all got along pretty well.
- There was just a real strong sense of cohesiveness
- and brotherhood among the group.
- And the music was everything, it really was.
- It really was.
- In our off time we went out and danced and drank and played
- and there was a social element to it
- as well that was kind of nice.
- It definitely was a strong sense of belonging.
- EVELYN BAILEY: I go to the concerts as often as I can.
- But I have always sensed tremendous pride
- in the men who are on the stage.
- They were not afraid.
- They were not unwilling to be out there.
- Because if you were in the Gay Men's Chorus, you were gay.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: True.
- But the music was first and foremost.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Yes.
- And I have to say, the very first concerts that I attended,
- the music took precedence over anything else.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: And I think it still does.
- There really is that level of professionalism
- that comes through.
- Nick was really adamant about that.
- He was a music teacher as well, so he wanted this level
- of excellence in the Chorus.
- And he really worked hard for that.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And I do think--
- the camp and so forth aside--
- it gave the community a tremendous sense
- of pride in being a gay community.
- In being a part of the gay organization
- that provided this entertainment.
- I will never forget the year that one
- of Nick's former students appeared on the stage
- with the Gay Men's Chorus.
- He and the Chorus members made being gay OK.
- There was no sense of shame.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, that's part of the whole continuum,
- from where we started with the Empty Closet.
- And how we moved into these social organizations,
- and political organizations.
- And sort of crept out more, and more, and more.
- And I think when the whole movement with the Gay Men's
- choruses came into being, it was another way of gaining,
- not only visibility, but respect and recognition for the gift
- you have-- and what you bring to the table.
- So it's kind of legitimacy, you know.
- We're not just crazy people who go to bars and get drunk.
- And screw around with each other,
- and walk around in dresses, and want to be girls.
- It sort of took all of those stereotypes
- and pushed them aside, and brought new ones
- to the table for us-- for people to be aware of.
- And so, I think that that's just part of the whole continuum--
- the movement toward acceptance as gay people.
- And then, the women's chorus started up--
- the idea of bringing the gift of music,
- and using it as a unifying factor.
- But you know, I think gay people have always
- been part of the arts.
- Which is why I've always been somewhat
- comfortable in my own skin, as an artist who is also gay.
- My books that I do--
- I've done six books now.
- They're pretty out there, in terms of, I'm gay,
- and there's no denying it.
- My work is very gay, and it has a political undertone,
- if you see beyond the superficial aspects of it.
- And so that's all part of just developing
- a sense of pride in who I am, and bringing that
- to other people.
- Age does a lot too, Evelyn.
- As we get older, and realize that our days on this planet
- are limited, that most of our life has been lived,
- how do you want to spend the rest
- of your days, the remaining days of your life?
- Do you want to live in fear and still hide who you are?
- Or do you want to say to people, screw you, I don't care.
- It's my life.
- It's almost over, I'll live it the way I want to.
- It's kind of like you just develop that.
- EVELYN BAILEY: You go beyond the things that hold you back,
- that used to hold you back.
- And you're not afraid any longer.
- It is a rite of passage.
- It is a way in which to leave a legacy.
- And leave to a future generation,
- not only what you've become, but what
- you dream the future to be--
- and can be.
- You have always, in your artwork and in your generosity
- to the community, given a tremendous amount
- of your talent, your time, your energy.
- And that will continue on--
- whether one person is affected, two people are affected,
- a whole group are affected.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, I think we
- don't have a way of knowing what effect we have.
- We just do what we have to do for ourselves.
- And sometimes it makes a difference,
- and sometimes it doesn't.
- But you just have no way of assessing that.
- I don't know that my artwork affects anybody.
- I do it just because I need to do it.
- And that's the simple justification for it,
- in my mind.
- And in spite of what I do for the community,
- I think of all the things I don't do for the community--
- that I might be doing, and could be doing,
- and I don't do anymore.
- Because I'm selfish about my time.
- And my husband, on the other hand, is an altruist.
- He's truly-- is a driving force.
- He can't stop, that's who he is.
- And you know, I give of him.
- That's my contribution now is Tom.
- I sit back, and I'm more of a behind the scenes
- kind of person.
- But I've always been that way.
- I'm not the kind of person to be really out front.
- I don't like calling attention to myself.
- It's just my nature to be that way.
- But I know that in a lot of subtle ways I effect.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Did you ever think, in 1976,
- that the Empty Closet would be printed and produced
- for this long?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: I guess I never really thought of it.
- I just did the job I did because it served
- a purpose, on many levels.
- It gave me a sense of strength and reassurance
- about who I was, and about how I wanted to identify myself
- as a gay man.
- And the kind of self-respect and pride I
- wanted to take in who I was.
- And it also filled a need.
- And I guess beyond the time I spent there,
- I just had no way of knowing how long it would go on.
- It's sort of like any organization-- people step
- down, and others step in to fill those vacancies.
- I think without Susan Jordan, the newspaper
- could not have continued.
- She has really been the driving force in that.
- There's no doubt about it.
- And I think its days might have been numbered without her--
- without her contribution.
- She has made it what it is, and she's kept it going.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Twenty-three years
- as editor is an extraordinary feat for anyone.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: It is, there's no doubt about that.
- And there are so many other people
- who are part of the paper now, that in the past would not
- have been visible, or would not have come forward.
- People write columns.
- People get involved in the process--
- there's a whole staff.
- And it's just doing a great job.
- And it's such a valid newspaper, in terms of what it brings.
- I read it every month when it comes out, or at least
- flip through it, and find things in there that
- are of significance and importance to me.
- The thing that I think is really so amazing in the newspaper,
- when I look through it now, I read the ads
- to see who's not afraid to be associated
- with a gay newspaper.
- Who's come to the smart realization
- that we have money too, and we spend money too.
- Courting the gay community is not a bad thing,
- because we spend money too.
- So it pays to advertise in our newspaper.
- There was a time when we couldn't
- get people to advertise in the newspaper,
- because of fear of stigma from being associated
- with a gay newspaper.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Well, initially, there
- weren't many advertisements at all.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: No, most of the gay organizations-- the bars.
- EVELYN BAILEY: The bars, primarily, yeah.
- But I don't know that there was much space
- to put in much advertising.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, the advertising
- is what paid for the newspaper.
- And so we needed to sell advertising to keep going.
- So there was always that fear that we
- weren't going to have the funds we needed to put out the paper.
- The paper defined itself, in terms of what we had available.
- And how far we could go with it, in terms
- of the pages and the production.
- It's just the way it worked out.
- EVELYN BAILEY: From where you are today, looking back,
- what would you identify as the proudest moment of your life
- as a gay man?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Wow.
- I don't know if I could pick any one.
- There were different ones at different times
- that have been significant, for different reasons.
- I think probably one of the most significant moments in my life,
- was being able to get married--
- Tom and I going to Massachusetts,
- and going before a JP, and getting married.
- It was like, wow, this is really happening.
- This is amazing.
- I would never have believed it.
- So much so, to the fact that I never
- thought that I would do it, because it just
- seemed like marriage was nothing that could ever really happen.
- So it just sort of like ruled it out across the board,
- as just not being a part of my life.
- And just to be sitting there, exchanging
- vows with somebody that I had been with for much of my life.
- And you know, that was pretty substantial.
- Being at the Gala Conference in Minneapolis
- was another amazing experience.
- I think those are probably two of the most
- significant events in my life.
- I mean, I've been to the parades,
- and marched in the parades.
- Parades are just not me.
- I don't understand parades.
- Whether it's a lilac parade, or whether it's a gay parade,
- it just seems kind of silly walking down
- the middle of the street, waving banners and flags.
- It's a celebration, and I understand
- the significance of it, but it doesn't do it for me.
- The small victories are the ones that work for me, although Gala
- was not small by any means.
- But we were small--
- Rochester was small by comparison
- to the other communities.
- And we excelled in such a way that it
- was a very amazing experience.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Did you ever think, in your lifetime,
- that you would see gay marriage in New York state?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: I was optimistic--
- that, yes, once it started to happen,
- it was going to happen in New York state.
- I can remember listening to Eliot Spitzer saying,
- it's going to happen.
- It's just a matter of time, but it will happen.
- And believing that it would--
- when he spoke at the ESPA dinner.
- So yeah, I believed it would happen in New York.
- But you know, it's like I said to Tom,
- "We don't have to wait for New York."
- And we didn't.
- When there was a lot of debate about whether we should
- opt for civil unions or marriage,
- there were a few members of the community who
- were courting politicians, and suggesting that we would
- be happy with civil unions.
- And I said, you know, we don't have to settle.
- We already have the right to be married.
- We can go to any state and get married,
- and have it recognized in New York state.
- And that's what you do.
- You don't wait for New York.
- You go somewhere else and get married.
- As long as New York was of the mind that we would recognize--
- once that happened, there was no reason to wait for New York.
- Because once they said we'll accept marriages
- from other places, go somewhere else.
- If New York doesn't want your money, take it somewhere else.
- So that's how we approached it.
- And we've not been married in New York state.
- We don't see any need to be married in New York state.
- We are legally married in the state of Massachusetts.
- And the state of Massachusetts is the state to watch,
- because they're the ones who are challenging the federal law.
- And if they win, we win.
- I'm a very strong liberal-minded person,
- and I have issues with the whole concept of marriage.
- Why people need to get married to validate their love--
- they don't.
- We really don't.
- From a legal standpoint, I understand it--
- in terms of benefits, and stuff like that.
- Because marriage really discriminates
- against individuals, and I think that's unfair.
- I don't think that you should be denied rights
- because you're not married, that people who are married get.
- That's an inequality, as far as I'm concerned.
- And marriage, to me, is a very heterosexual concept.
- EVELYN BAILEY: I agree.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: So I think it's all
- bullshit, really, to treat people differently because they
- carry one label, or not.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Well, that tradition
- goes back hundreds and hundreds of years,
- and is not something that we have instituted per se.
- It was instituted 2,000 years ago,
- and not about to be broken down, and those rights
- taken away from anyone.
- However, I do believe as you clearly stated,
- the benefits and the rights that come
- with being in a relationship that is committed--
- gay men and women need to have those rights,
- and those benefits.
- I wish there was another way to label it, to identify it,
- perhaps.
- Because it is a heterosexual concept.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: And we all know that the real reason
- for opposition is rooted in religion.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Right.
- It has nothing to do with the legality.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: No, it has nothing
- to do with the secular aspects.
- It's really all about religion, which
- is obviously the most driving evil force in the world today--
- organized religion.
- Which is just absurd, from my perspective,
- why people feel the need to go to a church that doesn't
- support their belief systems.
- Or why they need a church to tell them
- how to conduct themselves morally, is just beyond--
- I mean, if you believe in God, you
- don't need church to substantiate that belief
- system.
- You can go right around the church.
- You don't need that intermediary.
- You don't need the church to tell you how to believe in God,
- or what to believe in.
- You, morally, know right from wrong.
- And if the church isn't telling you what you want to hear,
- then don't listen.
- But people can't think for themselves.
- It's a catch-22-- they're so afraid of that whole concept
- of being condemned and damned for eternity.
- They buy into that bullshit, and they just sort of feel
- that they're afraid to stand up for what they believe in.
- And it takes a lot for them to do that.
- I mean, that's the whole basis of homophobia.
- It was the thing in my mother's mind,
- that rebelled in shock when I told her that I was gay--
- this whole concept that it's morally wrong.
- And it's, like what's going to happen to you,
- because you're a sinner, you're evil, you're bad, you're wrong.
- It all comes from indoctrination from the church.
- I think marriage is another thing just
- gets caught up in that--
- EVELYN BAILEY: Process.
- So Bill, after all your years of living,
- and all of your experiences, if you
- were to have the opportunity to share the wisdom of those years
- with young people, the youth of today,
- what would you tell them?
- Or, what do you tell them?
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Yeah, I still do talk to young people.
- And I realize that there is a process of self-acceptance
- that is the basis for everything you do in life.
- And I think that that's really where it all begins.
- I've seen some people who have absolutely no problem being
- gay, and being who they are.
- And other people who struggle with it all the time.
- And I think the reason that they do, is because of self-image.
- Because of being handed this belief that
- they are second-rate people in many ways.
- It's not just being gay.
- Self-esteem is not just predicated
- on your sexual identity, but a lot of other things.
- I feel that life is short.
- And you don't realize it when you're twenty years old,
- because you think you have so many years ahead of you.
- And what they don't realize, is that the years
- go by faster as you get older.
- And it's very true, as you well know.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Too fast.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: And you run out of life
- very quickly so why should you spend
- your time doubting who you are and struggling
- with your self-image.
- Do the reading.
- Do what you need to do to improve.
- If you've got issues, deal with them.
- Don't just wait for them to resolve themselves.
- It doesn't happen that way--
- until you become assertive enough to say,
- OK, this is a problem, I'm going to deal with it,
- And you deal with it in the right way, it's always there.
- So you need to quit wasting your life.
- Get on with it, and live it.
- And live it the way you want to live it,
- and don't let anyone tell you how to live your life.
- If the church is an issue, don't deal with the church.
- If the government is an issue, do
- what you need to do to come to terms with that.
- Join an organization that's working to change things.
- It'll improve your self-esteem, even though change
- is, as I found, very slow.
- I thought, in the '70s, we were on the verge of a breakthrough.
- That once we got that psychological approval
- that we weren't sick anymore, that life
- was going to change overnight.
- And it didn't-- it just didn't.
- And it felt like--
- it's been such a long, hard struggle.
- And we're just starting to see it
- reaching a level of fruition.
- It's been a long life.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Well, it has been.
- But I think in the overall picture
- from the time we begin this battle of equal rights
- which maybe people put down to Stonewall
- but it really was fermenting before--
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Centuries ago.
- EVELYN BAILEY: So, 1969 to 2012, is forty-three years.
- In comparison to, how long did it
- take the women to get the right to vote?
- How long did it take for slavery to not be an institution?
- How long did it take for the United States
- to not only declare its independence,
- but to create a government which was
- inclusive of all of the states?
- Not a long period of time, when you compare it
- to other movements, and other histories.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: You're right.
- I just don't understand the thinking
- that goes behind some people's assertation
- that they are superior, and that other people are
- subject to them.
- Whether it's women, whether it's minorities--
- like gays, or blacks, or Hispanics, or what it is.
- That whole element is pretty peculiar to me,
- that puts some people in a position of power and status
- over others.
- That creates this whole kind of element of--
- EVELYN BAILEY: Well, you bring up an interesting point.
- And I'll just briefly share with you--
- my own sense, is that when you are comfortable with yourself--
- when you have said, I own what I am, and what I'm not.
- I accept that I have been given life--
- have not taken it, or earned it, that it is gift to breathe.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: To get out of bed in the morning is a gift.
- EVELYN BAILEY: You begin to see people
- in a very simple paradigm--
- we all shit, we all eat, we all breathe.
- We'll begin life and we'll all die.
- There is no better or worse.
- There is no power.
- The human condition is the human condition.
- What makes one different from the other--
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Or what makes one feel superior to the other,
- is really what's the issue.
- And I don't understand how some people
- feel they are born with an entitlement over other people.
- EVELYN BAILEY: You learn that.
- It is not innate.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: I don't think it is either.
- But it doesn't have anything to do, necessarily,
- with socioeconomic status.
- EVELYN BAILEY: No.
- It has to do with attitude and it
- has to do with previous history, and how you
- look at that previous history.
- If I don't feel I'm any more important, or any less
- important than anyone else.
- I'm very happy to say, I don't have the degrees that you have.
- That doesn't imply I'm any less smart, or any smarter.
- We're just different.
- And whenever we have differences, there tends to be,
- in our mind, a hierarchical ordering of those differences.
- And that hierarchical ordering comes
- because we don't feel safe and secure within ourselves.
- BILL GIANCURSIO: Well, the other thing about discrimination
- and prejudice, is the fact that people are getting better
- at concealing it.
- But I don't think that it's gotten really any better.
- I think it's alive and well.
- EVELYN BAILEY: I'm going to say, thank you for the interview,
- and for sharing your thoughts.
- So I can turn this off.