Audio Interview, Dan Sapper, November 28, 2012
- EVELYN BAILEY: I'm sitting here talking to Dan Sapper.
- It is Wednesday, November 28.
- And Dan has been a member and continues
- to be a member of the Lambda Network at Kodak.
- And I'm not exactly sure what the actual name is,
- whether it's Lambda Kodak, whether it's Kodak Lambda,
- what the--
- but--
- DAN SAPPER: Lambda Network at Kodak.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Lambda Network at Kodak.
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And so Dan, when did you
- get involved with the Network?
- DAN SAPPER: I was a charter member of the Network.
- And that means I was among the first group of members in--
- I think it was 1992.
- And we weren't officially recognized by Kodak
- at that point, but we had the beginnings of organizations.
- And I think the first thing that I
- saw was an ad in the Empty Closet that said,
- if you work at Kodak and you're interested in getting together
- as a group of LGBT--
- it was probably just gay and lesbian--
- workers, you know, please call this number.
- And I think it was David Kosel's phone number,
- if I remember correctly.
- And I was told that we're having a meeting at his home
- to start planning a group, and whoever
- would like to be a part should come to this first meeting.
- So that's how I got involved.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Now I know there were other groups,
- diversity groups at Kodak.
- The LGBT group was not the first.
- DAN SAPPER: No.
- I think the first was--
- I think it was Network North Star, which was
- the African American network.
- And then shortly after that was the Women's Forum.
- And Lambda was in the second wave of groups,
- and I think that included the Asia Pacific Exchange, HOLA,
- which--
- a Hispanic Organization for Leadership, and Lambda Network
- I think were the next three.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Mm-hmm.
- I don't know if you can answer this question,
- but why did those groups come into existence?
- DAN SAPPER: You know, I think the--
- I can't speak a lot for the earliest groups,
- although I do think there was a natural gathering
- of African American leaders at Kodak.
- And there may actually have been a--
- I'm not sure whether it was really formally recognized,
- but you know, like there's caucus groups in Congress.
- It was a group of African American managers
- who felt that they had common experiences,
- and were talking amongst each other,
- and I think were helping mentor like-minded people.
- So the African Americans, I think,
- formed around that group.
- The Women's Forum may have had also a similar experience.
- And you know, I think from the gay perspective,
- I think we were looking for some connection to each other.
- I don't think at first that we had a huge--
- and I have to be careful about this,
- but I don't think we had a huge driving force
- to try to change something at Kodak.
- There was certainly a need.
- But I think the need was more human connection
- to each other over a driving force that something was wrong,
- diversity-wise.
- EVELYN BAILEY: So when you got together
- at that first meeting with David Kosel,
- who-- do you remember who the other people in the group were?
- DAN SAPPER: You know, it was a pretty big group.
- I think there were probably--
- you know, I'm picturing a party years and years ago.
- But there probably were a good twenty or twenty-five people
- there.
- And I think David Kosel, Kathryn I think was there,
- Kathryn Rivers.
- I'm not-- I think Emily Jones was there,
- Chuck Collins, myself.
- Oh, I don't know whether-- there were a few other people
- from the outset.
- Faye Wilbur, perhaps, I think was a charter member.
- She's still a current member.
- Jim Eamon perhaps was there.
- Those are some of the names that I recall right
- from the beginning.
- EVELYN BAILEY: What was the kind of conversation--
- DAN SAPPER: Gary Gray.
- And Gary Gray.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Gary Gray.
- Yes.
- DAN SAPPER: There's a name.
- EVELYN BAILEY: What was the conversation?
- DAN SAPPER: I remember one of the things
- that we did at that meeting was come up
- with a name for the group.
- And we had, as is so popular now, Post-it notes.
- It was like one of the first applications of Post-it notes
- that I remember.
- You know, let's-- everybody put some ideas on a Post-it note
- and put them up on the wall, and we were brainstorming names
- for the group.
- I think we talked about, what are some of the hot topics
- that--
- you know, why should there be a group?
- And I think it's pertinent to say
- that some years prior, probably in the mid to late '80s,
- Kodak did modify their equal opportunity employment policy
- to include sexual orientation.
- So that was already a done deal.
- Kodak already said, we do not discriminate
- on the basis of sexual orientation in the late '80s.
- And here we were in the early '90s thinking, OK.
- Well, you know, I think--
- we were talking-- maybe starting to talk about domestic partner
- benefits.
- But one of the criteria for the employee networks at Kodak,
- which is the generic title for all these employee resource
- groups, was that we not be a bargaining group,
- and that we not be representing the gays to Kodak,
- which would make us more like a union rather than a resource
- group.
- So the conversation I think at that first meeting
- was, these are the rules that Kodak has asked us to abide by.
- If we form as a group, here's a set of guidelines
- that Kodak has issued for formation
- of an employee resource group.
- And so I think the conversation was
- around those guidelines, which said, you know,
- we're not here to represent the gays to Kodak.
- We're not here to bargain for benefits.
- We're not here to demand things of the company.
- We can't represent Kodak as a group, you know?
- We are not Kodak.
- Employees are not Kodak.
- Kodak is Kodak.
- Employees are separate.
- And these guidelines were a clear delineation.
- So I think some of the conversation
- was just getting everybody in the room square with the idea
- that if we were to form an employee resource group that it
- would be on Kodak's terms.
- And I think we generally agreed that they were good terms.
- And among the very earliest things that had to be done,
- and probably was discussed at this first meeting,
- was what would be the mission of the group?
- And how would the mission of the group support Kodak's business?
- Because that is the main criteria for the employee
- resource group, is it's a group of employees who supports
- Kodak's business success.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Within the group, were there particular needs
- expressed?
- I mean, you said network.
- You know, create connections.
- Maybe in a one-minute description,
- when you work at Kodak, are you pretty isolated?
- I mean, I don't--
- DAN SAPPER: So you can't see the big smile
- on my face on the tape.
- But you, know back then in the early '90s,
- I mean, Kodak was probably nearly as big as it ever was.
- So I don't think we were isolated, but you know,
- because there were so many people working at Kodak.
- You might know one or two gay people in your work area,
- but there were so many buildings at Kodak
- and so many different shifts of workers, you know--
- A shift, B shift, night shift, day shift, weekends.
- And so there's no way that of the maybe 60,000 Kodak
- workers at the time in Rochester that you would know,
- where are the other gay people?
- They're in other buildings, they're at other plants.
- There's Kodak Park.
- There's Kodak Office.
- There was Elmgrove, there was Hawkeye Plant,
- there was C Building, there was the Carlson Road Plant,
- there was the West Avenue, the Lincoln Plant,
- I think they called it.
- So isolated in that we were in different sites
- even in Rochester.
- Riverwood was the marketing center down in Henrietta.
- So isolated in the sense that, you know,
- pretty much you would maybe know a little bit of the gay network
- within your building if you were lucky, or if you were out.
- Or even if you weren't out, you might figure it out,
- who was who.
- So isolated in some senses, yes.
- In other senses, I think the network was an opportunity
- to learn who's who, and what could we
- be if we were better connected socially?
- And we did have--
- I think our earliest events were mainly social events.
- EVELYN BAILEY: What was your mission?
- What eventually developed as your mission, if you recall?
- DAN SAPPER: And I think our mission really
- hasn't changed much.
- And let me think about whether I can recite it.
- Probably not.
- But Lambda Network-- and this is rough--
- but Lambda Network is a group of Kodak employees and retirees
- who contribute to Kodak's business success by--
- from-- I don't know whether promoting is in there,
- but promoting inclusion regardless or indifferent
- to sexual orientation.
- That was one of our key things, was we didn't want to call
- attention to sexual orientation.
- So our vision was, hey.
- If we could be successful as gay employees,
- regardless of our sexual orientation,
- then we would be successful.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And Kodak would be successful.
- DAN SAPPER: And Kodak would be more successful.
- So I think that's the gist.
- And I'm probably leaving something out,
- and I probably have the whole mission down in my briefcase
- in the trunk of my car.
- But it's pretty much that same mission and vision today
- is that we enable Kodak's business success
- and drive towards full inclusion,
- regardless of sexual orientation.
- And we thought it was important to say regardless,
- because you know, when you say sexual orientation,
- people automatically think gay and lesbian,
- and they don't think straight, heterosexual
- as a sexual orientation.
- So you know, we did have a lot of conversations
- early on about that.
- EVELYN BAILEY: When did you decide,
- or how did it come about that you
- began to engage management in your desire to be inclusive,
- but also your educational endeavors?
- Was education a part of your mission?
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- I think it was.
- I think that was probably in our mission's--
- well, I don't know.
- Somewhere in the mission or vision,
- I think we may have the word education,
- through education and--
- through education that we accomplish
- that goal of having sexual orientation be
- a little more transparent, and enabling people to be
- themselves in the workplace.
- You know, it was all focused around the workplace.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Uh-huh.
- And your engagement of--
- DAN SAPPER: Management.
- EVELYN BAILEY: --management was because--
- DAN SAPPER: Well, I think there were probably
- several different prompts in that regard.
- The biggest engagement driver that I recall
- came several years after our formation.
- So somewhere around-- I think it was
- 1996 where we had our first educational event,
- and we called it The Lambda Educational
- Event with Management.
- And it was specifically an event where we wanted managers
- to attend, not--
- I mean, we certainly welcomed the general employees,
- but that was not the way we built the event.
- The event was an educational event with management.
- And it was a sit-down dinner with a program,
- and it was held at the Burgundy Basin Inn.
- And one of the key things that we
- did to prepare for that event was we
- had to build support with management
- to even show their faces at the door.
- And we had to build support within the gay population
- of Kodak to even show their faces at the door,
- because this was basically a coming out
- party for Kodak workers.
- I mean, it really was.
- It's like, you know, you'd see the managers in the room
- and you'd see the gays in the room.
- And it was the first time that that was happening at Kodak.
- So it was a really big deal.
- So what we did to prepare for that
- was we paired up in teams of two and we
- made a list of the forty--
- I think was forty top managers at Kodak.
- And we went out in teams of male and female gay people,
- and we met with each of those top forty managers
- in the company and asked, would they support--
- would they support our group?
- Would they attend our event?
- That was the goal of going to their office.
- And it was always on their turf, from what I remember.
- And we were nervous as all get out
- to go knock on a manager's door and say, we're here.
- We're gay.
- We have this event coming up.
- We're the Lambda Network at Kodak, and are you supportive?
- You know, I mean, it really put people on the spot,
- putting the top managers of the company.
- And you know, we got a lot of hems and haws,
- but we also got several or more managers who
- were really willing to engage.
- Said, "Sure.
- And I'll bring my people with me."
- You know?
- "I'll bring my leadership team with me."
- So we would get small groups of leaders
- scattered around the company.
- People who wanted to be at this event, hear what we had to say.
- And that's how we initially got traction,
- was by knocking on people's doors
- and pounding the pavement.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Who was your partner?
- DAN SAPPER: I think it was Kathryn Rivers,
- if I remember correctly.
- We may have switched off a bit depending
- on who we were going to see and you know, who--
- you know, sometimes one person would
- have an in with a certain manager in a business unit
- or in the research labs.
- But I remember going to do that with Kathryn.
- And I think we did that practice for the first several years.
- We had this educational event with management once yearly.
- And I think we did that practice of knocking on managers' doors,
- or at least calling them in the successive years.
- You know, will you support us?
- Will you buy a table for your group?
- Will you invite others from your group
- and try to exponentially grow?
- EVELYN BAILEY: Were there any managers
- who refused to your face?
- DAN SAPPER: I don't--
- you know, possibly, but I don't recall for sure.
- You know, I think most of the top managers
- were a little more suave than that, you know?
- So somebody could conveniently have a conflict.
- You never know.
- With that kind of discrimination,
- you never know what the motivation is,
- and you never know if it's real or not.
- So you know, conflicts.
- Oh, my group's not quite ready for that.
- I think I might get a lot of pushback, you know?
- So there were excuses.
- There were definitely excuses.
- Refusals, I don't think there were any outright refusals,
- but there were a lot of excuses.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And what about management beyond the forty?
- The levels of, you know, CEO, VP?
- DAN SAPPER: We had--
- you know, we only had so many people in Lambda,
- so there were only so many doors that we could knock on.
- So this first event, if I remember correctly,
- this first event, we had ninety-something people.
- We may have had over 100 signed up,
- but only ninety-something showed up,
- which is typical for an event like that.
- And I think our goal was to have somewhere
- on the order of a fifty-fifty mix of gay people
- and straight people in the room.
- And I don't think that happened.
- I think it was more like maybe thirty gay people
- and sixty management.
- And probably unbeknownst to us, some of the management was gay.
- So there were a few winks and nods, I think.
- There were a few people there that
- came as managers who were not out of the closet.
- And so-- I lost track of the question.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Above the forty managers.
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- EVELYN BAILEY: VP, CEO.
- DAN SAPPER: Not a lot, but I think
- there was starting to get some traction among either
- the workgroups that some of the gay people in Lambda
- were part of and could convince their managers to attend.
- There were a few people who I didn't really recognize
- as top leaders of the company.
- Again, you know, Kodak was so huge at the time
- that you wouldn't necessarily know who was who.
- But I remember doing table charts and trying to decide,
- do we have enough gay people at this table?
- And who would be best to talk to that manager?
- And how are we going to-- you know, it's like a wedding.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Yeah.
- DAN SAPPER: Who's going to sit with who?
- And it was.
- You know, it was at the Burgundy Basin Inn.
- So there was a little bit of spread beyond the top forty,
- but I don't think it was--
- I don't think we drilled too deep.
- I think it was very spotty if there
- was a lower level of management from other parts
- of the company.
- It was spotty.
- EVELYN BAILEY: When did that begin to change?
- Because I think, if I'm not mistaken,
- at some of your educational events,
- you had the director of diversity, you had VPs,
- you had I think George Fisher.
- DAN SAPPER: Oh, yeah.
- George-- you know, George Fisher was probably
- one of the main driving forces of the strength
- that the employee networks took off
- with right at the beginning.
- So George Fisher was at that first event,
- and he was a speaker at our first event.
- We had a guest speaker who was Elizabeth Birch.
- Before she was in charge of the Human Rights Campaign,
- she was a legal counsel at Apple Computer.
- So picture, you know, 1996, Apple Computer when, you know,
- Macs were still a rage back then.
- But Apple was not what they are today.
- So Elizabeth Birch from Apple Computer.
- And we had--
- I think we had one other manager at Kodak, which
- I think was right around that time who
- had just come from Apple or had been a consultant with Apple.
- But there was some other connection
- between Kodak and Apple in the management ranks.
- So Elizabeth Birch made sense.
- And I want to say-- and don't quote me on this--
- but I want to say Andrew Scully maybe
- was the name, the other person from Apple that was somehow
- tied in with Kodak.
- And I don't remember what-- maybe it was a marketing--
- I think he may have been in consumer marketing.
- So George Fisher was really--
- George Fisher had come to Kodak in 1994
- as CEO, directly hired as CEO.
- And he came from Motorola.
- And one of the first things that he did--
- that I remember he did as CEO was created something
- called the Kodak values.
- And it was, here are five behaviors that we expect out
- of all employees, and one of those behaviors
- was respect for the dignity of the individual, which gets
- at all this diversity stuff.
- And you know, that's I think-- that was really
- empowering to Lambda Network.
- It was really empowering to gay people at the company,
- was you've got to respect me despite any differences
- that we may have.
- And it was fundamental.
- George Fisher, you know, really rolled out
- this whole concept of a company has
- to have a core set of values.
- And before that, you know, I don't
- think Kodak was bad at that kind of thing.
- But at the same time, we didn't stress it.
- EVELYN BAILEY: It wasn't articulated.
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- It wasn't articulated.
- That's a very good way to put it.
- And so George Fisher came in and said,
- here's five fundamental values.
- And trust and respect for the dignity of the individual
- were right at the top.
- And we really, as Lambda, leaned on those values.
- And I think all the diversity networks, the employee response
- groups relied on those values to give us
- the intestinal fortitude to be ourselves in the workplace.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Mm-hmm.
- Mm-hmm.
- How-- you were out when you came to Kodak.
- DAN SAPPER: Well, so that's interesting.
- I was out in Rochester, but I was not out at work.
- EVELYN BAILEY: What kind of--
- why?
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Why the disconnect?
- DAN SAPPER: So you know, why the disconnect?
- So you know, I came to Rochester first in 1982
- as a college co-op working for Kodak.
- Nineteen years old, I started working at Kodak.
- I wanted a career at Kodak.
- I was out on campus.
- You know, nineteen years old.
- I was a sophomore.
- I was just finding my legs at being gay, you know?
- I mean, you know, what do you know as an eighteen-year-old?
- I mean, and now, you know, kids are coming out earlier.
- But you know, I didn't know what kind of discrimination
- I would face at work, whether I would get a full-time job
- if somebody knew I was gay or not, especially as an engineer,
- you know?
- Maybe it would be different if I was in marketing
- or human resources.
- But you know, here I am, a guy working in the paper
- mill of all places.
- And you know, a sophomore.
- So I wasn't out.
- I was out on campus.
- And I would come for a work block, three or four-month work
- block at Kodak.
- You know, full time.
- And so it was a real disconnect between four months on campus
- being gay, four months at Kodak not being gay, you know?
- Four months back at campus, I can
- be gay again, because I was part of the gay group on campus.
- So you know, it didn't really make sense to me
- at the time of what being gay at work would look like.
- I was young.
- I didn't know what work looked like, let alone
- being gay at work.
- So that's where I started.
- I did meet on my co-op work blocks
- some full-time employees who were gay.
- I mean, we found each other in our building.
- You know, maybe I recognized somebody at Friar's, the bar
- on Monroe Avenue and said, "Hey.
- You work in my building at Kodak, don't you, you know?"
- And we struck up a friendship.
- So there were a couple people I think
- that I knew back then in the early '80s that
- were gay at work.
- And then I did get hired full time,
- and I was hired into a different area
- than I had been a co-op in.
- So again, you start all over again with a new set of people.
- You don't know who you can trust.
- So you know-- and I think it's like this probably
- in every workplace.
- You're cautious at first.
- Who can you trust?
- Who do you come out to first?
- It's always a process.
- You come out over and over again.
- And unless you come in with a rainbow flag
- or a picture of your husband--
- which, now we say husband--
- but picture of your partner and put him on your desk--
- I didn't have any of that when I was young, so I wasn't out.
- So you know, a few people knew, you know?
- I think a few gay people that I associated with.
- But I would say by the late '80s,
- I started to come out to some of my coworkers,
- to one of my bosses.
- And you know, I started feeling more comfortable.
- So that by the time Lambda Network came around,
- I was a little more secure.
- And then just the power of numbers
- and being in the network and seeing a few role models who
- were farther advanced in their career than I was
- and how they handled themselves.
- And you know, I think that was a good basis for the Lambda
- Network.
- You saw other role models who were out at work, how they were
- successful in their careers.
- I don't think I recognized it at the time as mentoring,
- but it was-- informal mentoring was happening just
- by being associated with Emily Jones, Kathryn Rivers, Chuck
- Collins, eventually Cindy Martin.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Yeah.
- Mm-hmm.
- So the Lambda Network at Kodak was really
- to support the business end.
- But I mean, to support each other in the workplace,
- to be more comfortable, to be more productive,
- to work with the corporation in order to be more contributing.
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- And that's the thing that I think we--
- over and over again, we remind ourselves
- and at various educational events,
- we find that there are still places where people
- are afraid to be themselves at work,
- and it ruins trust with your coworkers.
- They don't know who you are.
- They don't know if they can trust you as a gay person.
- I shouldn't say it that way.
- They don't know if they can trust you
- because you're not presenting yourself authentically.
- So that is key in banding together as a group,
- that we learn from each other how to be authentic.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And you were in--
- you were in a professional environment.
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah, as an engineer.
- Yeah.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Was there a difference
- between your environment and the manufacturing--
- DAN SAPPER: Absolutely.
- EVELYN BAILEY: --environment?
- DAN SAPPER: Absolutely.
- And I can recall--
- now one of my career moves--
- and it was because I was so involved with Lambda Network
- that I was comfortable with the idea of diversity
- and workplace.
- You know, growing diversity in the workplace.
- So one of my assignments was to be a diversity
- leader in my workplace.
- And that lasted a couple years.
- And there was a distinct need for it by that point,
- that Kodak was realizing that there were some inequities.
- So I do remember in my role as a cultural leader
- that there were gay employees coming to me in my building,
- saying, "You know, so and so called
- me a faggot over the phone when I was trying to do my job."
- "You know, I was asking somebody for some supplies,"
- and they basically said, "I'm not
- going to do anything for you, faggot."
- You know?
- So you know, clearly, you know, clear discrimination.
- You know, earlier in the conversation I said, "You know,
- you don't often know when you're being discriminated against."
- Well, you know, it was clear to me.
- It was clear to the guy that was called a faggot who
- was part of Lambda Network.
- I'm sorry for the strong language, but it happened.
- And so you know, I remember--
- you know, the guy was brave enough to come to me
- and say, "Hey, this happened to me.
- What do I do?"
- I said, "You know, now that you've told me,
- you know, we need to report it, you know?"
- You know, I think the rules at Kodak are--
- and I think the rules probably at any company--
- well, I shouldn't say that.
- The rules at Kodak are--
- (Laugh)
- --that if somebody tells you that they're
- having a problem in the workplace, especially
- harassment, that you should be obligated--
- you are obligated to bring it to a manager's or an HR person's
- attention.
- So I was sort of in a bridge role.
- My professional role was a bridge between employees
- and human resources.
- And so you know, now that you've told me,
- I feel obligated to bring this to somebody's attention.
- Are you comfortable with that?
- And I did.
- So there were many reports of--
- and I don't know how substantiated they are.
- But there were many reports of, you know,
- things that happened in manufacturing darkrooms.
- You know, Kodak photography.
- We make film in the darkrooms.
- We finish, slit, and spool film in darkrooms.
- You expose and process your pictures in darkrooms.
- So there were a lot of employees who worked in darkrooms,
- and it's an untrustworthy environment
- just because it's dark.
- You know?
- I mean, the darkness of night, you know?
- When you are walking the streets of any place at night,
- you're a little more uncomfortable
- because you can't see what's going on around you.
- And so the whole environment of the production shop floor
- and especially the darkrooms had a reputation
- for being a tough place.
- Whether it was or not, I think, you know, is debatable,
- whether it was really any rougher
- for gay people in the darkrooms versus in the white light.
- I can't say for certain.
- EVELYN BAILEY: But there does seem
- to be certainly a difference between professional office
- and manufacturing in terms of the overtness
- of the possible discrimination or harassment.
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- And without stereotyping, you know,
- the education level's different.
- The street smarts are different.
- And I have to say, I think the street smarts are probably
- smarter on the shop floor than there
- are at the professional level, you know?
- I mean, you know, college smarts are
- different than street smarts.
- So you know, there's definitely a different dynamic
- between professional and manufacturing.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Did the culture--
- well, let me ask you this.
- How did the presence of the Lambda Network at Kodak
- change the culture at Kodak?
- Or did it?
- DAN SAPPER: Well, I think it certainly did.
- It allowed people to figure out how
- to be a little more out at work in a safe environment.
- So you know, things like the safe place, safe space
- magnet where you have a symbol that says,
- this space is safe to discuss LGBT issues.
- That was a result of the training sessions
- that Lambda did.
- Not just the yearly educational events, but lunchtime sessions
- that we would do when local--
- you know, any local area that called us or that we were told
- might need our help.
- You know, we tried to make the inroads.
- And when we went through one of our training sessions,
- we offered people, hey.
- If you can commit to providing a safe place for LGBT people
- to have these conversations with them, whether you're straight
- or gay or an ally, you know, please
- feel free to post this magnet.
- So you know, you started seeing these things posted around,
- and you got a sense for who was an ally
- And you didn't necessarily know whether they
- were straight or gay.
- But so we built that little bit of a network.
- We had these educational events that
- would allow people to express.
- Hey, you know, if we're doing a training somewhere, you know,
- there might be somebody in the group receiving
- the training who would come out of the closet
- to their workgroup.
- It's like, oh.
- That was unexpected, you know?
- Sometimes it was very joyous, and sometimes it
- was tearful when that happened.
- But sometimes people felt they had
- to speak up, because people were starting to--
- in a conference room environment,
- you know, say what they really felt, which we encourage.
- You know, we say, hey, you know, what's behind these closed
- doors, you know, let's talk.
- Let's have a conversation.
- And sometimes they could get ugly, and people in the room
- didn't realize they were talking about their coworker who
- was sitting right next to them in an ugly fashion.
- That's one of the things about being
- gay is it doesn't always show.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Yeah.
- DAN SAPPER: So you know, trust can get destroyed.
- It's a two-way street, you know?
- If the gay person doesn't share of themselves,
- that doesn't promote trust.
- But if a coworker spouts homophobia or anti-gay jokes
- or anything like that, or just bad words, you know,
- that destroys trust too.
- You know, it builds barriers.
- So I think Lambda really, just by being
- out there, by showing our faces more,
- gave people courage, strength to speak up.
- And it built in the management, in the leadership
- ranks the qualities to speak up as allies on behalf.
- If they heard those kind of bad jokes,
- whether they were just in bad taste
- or whether they were really singling somebody out,
- you know, it gave people the courage to say, hey.
- That isn't right.
- That isn't respectful, which was one of the Kodak values.
- You're being disrespectful.
- And there were people that we heard
- of getting fired for that kind of behavior.
- And I hate to say it, but I'm going to say it on the record.
- There were some joyous moments in the Lambda Network
- at Kodak when we found out that people
- were fired for using bad language
- or for promoting homophobic jokes,
- posting homophobic jokes in the workplace,
- and doing so publicly.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Right.
- So in the process, management became a strong ally.
- DAN SAPPER: They became empowered, yeah.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And do you recall when Kodak began publicly
- to be supportive of LGBT rights or diversity rights?
- DAN SAPPER: You know, there were things that happened early
- before Lambda Network.
- Like I said, sexual orientation was
- added to our nondiscrimination clause.
- I think it was '86, but it may have been '88.
- So you know, we knew that somewhere somebody got it,
- because that was early for most companies, you know,
- for almost any Fortune 500 company
- to include sexual orientation in their nondiscrimination
- statement.
- Kodak was early, early, early.
- Very early.
- I think Xerox and Kodak were neck and neck in that regard.
- And I think Kodak may have been first,
- but I'm not certain about that.
- So there was something going on in the late '80s.
- But as Lambda began to do these educational events
- and various managers, we started giving award--
- Lambda started giving an award called the OUTSpoken
- and Visible Award.
- And Visible.
- Not Invisible.
- And the out being, you're putting yourself out there
- by speaking up on behalf of gays.
- We found, who are the top leaders in the Lambda Network's
- eyes who are doing the most to support a more open culture?
- And the first several years that we offered that award,
- we had multiple candidates and good candidates.
- So I think that, it helped spread the strength by saying,
- here's the role models.
- We want to point them out.
- And we allowed those people at our annual event,
- we gave the award publicly at our annual educational event
- with management and allowed the recipient
- to tell their story of how they came
- to be such a strong supporter.
- And that also helped mentor others.
- And you know, this is how I did it.
- This is how you can do it.
- Be a strong supporter for LGBT diversity.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Yeah, when I said publicly,
- I was thinking more along the lines of legislation,
- whether it be at the federal level or the state level.
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- I'm trying to remember when ENDA first came before Congress.
- I don't know if you recall, but it had to be in the mid
- to late '90s.
- So right around this time that Lambda was,
- you know, getting our annual educational event
- with management going, and we were growing that event.
- You know, the first year was 100.
- The next year was 150.
- The third year was 200 people attending.
- I think it probably had to be around--
- I'm guessing '97 or '98.
- And it was Mike Morley was our--
- he was President of Kodak, and he was the Vice President
- for Human Resources.
- But he was a president of the company,
- and he testified before--
- I think it was a Senate subcommittee.
- I'm not sure that it was a full Senate.
- But it was a subcommittee that was considering ENDA.
- You know, to put ENDA up for a vote,
- and whether it was going to get out of committee.
- And Mike Morley went and testified before Congress
- in support of ENDA.
- And it didn't pass.
- ENDA didn't pass when it came before Congress,
- and it still hasn't passed, right?
- No.
- Employment nondiscrimination at the federal level.
- No, I don't--
- EVELYN BAILEY: Not at the federal level.
- That's at the state level.
- DAN SAPPER: So it came up again, I think, around 2004, 2005.
- And I think Mike Morley was just retiring right around then,
- and Bob Berman was becoming the leader in human resources.
- And Bob Berman went a second time for the same purpose
- to testify before a congressional subcommittee
- in support of ENDA.
- EVELYN BAILEY: OK.
- DAN SAPPER: So you know, those were some of the early things.
- But there was starting to be pockets of support.
- Like, you know, the gay and lesbian film festivals
- were starting to become popular in various cities.
- And unbeknownst to Lambda--
- I don't remember whether it was our New York office
- or our Hollywood office--
- was sponsoring the gay and lesbian film festivals
- in Los Angeles and New York City.
- And we said, hey, wait a second.
- If they're doing it in New York City,
- they should be doing it for our local film festival.
- And so you know, it was an opportunity for Lambda to try
- to corral Kodak and say, hey.
- You know, maybe there's an opportunity here
- that we're missing because we're too scattered in these events.
- But you know, could we--
- maybe the entertainment imaging, the motion picture group
- could do some sort of sponsorship
- at some of the biggest festivals.
- And I think it became a little clearer that, yeah, they
- would do that, and they would do it consistently.
- So those kinds of things started to become more visible.
- The Out & Equal Workplace Summit started to happen,
- and they were looking for sponsorships.
- And so again, Lambda I think started
- leaning on our Global Diversity group and our Community Affairs
- group and said, hey.
- Is this something that you would consider sponsoring?
- Because we think it's a direct tie-in with the work
- that Lambda Network's trying to do.
- And you know, the answer was yes.
- So there were a few key initiatives
- that Lambda was able to tell management about that, hey.
- These would be good things for the company to do.
- It would be good to sponsor Out & Equal.
- It would be good to sponsor GLSEN.
- It would be good to sponsor GLAAD.
- It would be good to sponsor the GAGB locally.
- GrantMaker, the film festival.
- And these are some of the things that now that Kodak
- has financial problems with our Chapter 11 bankruptcy,
- we're not doing as much of.
- And hopefully, that's only temporary.
- But I think when the business ramps back up and becomes
- more profitable, hopefully we can reengage
- in a lot of those things.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Tell me about the Corporate Equality Index.
- And I know Lambda--
- I mean, I know Kodak was one of the first in Rochester
- to have 100%.
- Was that a deliberate focus for the company?
- Or had the company already incorporated those things,
- and just kind of scored that 100%
- because it was already there?
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- The Corporate Equality Index started
- before HRC took it over.
- And the name is escaping me of-- it was an individual.
- I don't think that there was any--
- there wasn't any strong linkage to, like I said, HRC.
- But we knew--
- Kodak was participating in this survey
- several years before HRC took it over.
- So I think that was in the late '90s, 1999-ish
- that this survey started being done.
- And Kodak was among the first companies to participate.
- And it was after Kodak started offering health care
- benefits to domestic partners.
- So you know, we had some of the main criteria already checked
- off.
- In fact, we probably had most of the main criteria already
- checked off.
- So it sort of became a formality.
- And we said, hey.
- Let's participate in this survey,
- let's see if there are any gaps.
- So it was a way of scoring ourselves.
- Rating-- you know, I think it was a helpful way for the gays
- to bring attention to management that there's
- things that were missing in the workplace in a way that was not
- collective bargaining.
- And that's very important.
- That was very important to Lambda,
- and it was very important to Kodak
- that we did not come to management
- and say, we want health care benefits,
- because that would be against the policies, the guidelines
- for these employee networks.
- But we could say, hey, there's a survey out there,
- and we think it would be really good for Kodak to participate.
- And oh, by the way, you know, one of the criteria is--
- to do well on the survey is to offer domestic partner health
- benefits.
- Hey, wait a second.
- We already have that.
- What else is on the survey that we could be doing better at?
- So it was really--
- it was a great way to engage the company without busting
- our guidelines wide open.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And my assumption is it was not threatening.
- DAN SAPPER: It was not threatening.
- And it--
- EVELYN BAILEY: To Kodak.
- DAN SAPPER: Right.
- And it allowed that trust to develop between the Network
- and the company that, hey.
- This group isn't going to demand stuff of the company,
- and it makes it look like it was the company's idea
- to begin with, when it was really probably on our minds
- all the time.
- Because that's why these surveys are so important,
- is because they're the leading indicator.
- This is what's important to that group.
- Is the company doing it?
- So you know, what comes first?
- The chicken or the egg?
- Probably in this case, the egg.
- The survey came first.
- Lambda found out about it.
- Probably brought it to the attention of the company.
- Said, let's participate.
- And the company was already on the road
- to doing well, because I think we
- had some good traction with HR and the diversity office,
- and certainly with George Fisher.
- EVELYN BAILEY: I'm sure when you first
- became involved with the Lambda Network at Kodak
- you had no idea of what the next twenty or thirty years
- would bring in terms of growth within the company,
- of the trust, of the relationship between Lambda
- and the company.
- Looking back over those years, what are you most proud of?
- DAN SAPPER: Hmm.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Besides just surviving to today.
- I mean in terms of the Network.
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- In terms of the Network.
- You know, the Network gave me an excuse to be out at work.
- It really did.
- And so you know, what am I proud of?
- Personally, I'm proud to be out of work.
- Because without a group of people
- that were doing the same thing in other buildings,
- you know, being out themselves, without that collective
- mindset, you know, I don't think I would have had
- as much wherewithal to be out.
- And it also gave me an excuse to talk about it, because--
- to talk about, how does sexual orientation
- play out in the workplace?
- Because I didn't have a partner for many of those years.
- I didn't have a partner.
- And it's much more difficult to talk
- about gay and lesbian issues if you
- don't talk about how it plays out in your very
- ordinary daily life, you know?
- You know, the old terminology of lifestyle.
- It's like, you know, hey.
- My lifestyle with my now husband Jim
- is very much like a heterosexual lifestyle of,
- go to work, go home, cook dinner, walk the dog,
- do the laundry, play in the garden, take a walk.
- You know, this very ordinary daily life that I live.
- But being able to say, Jim and I did such and such,
- that wasn't available to me before--
- you know, I mean, Jim and my relationship started in 1999.
- But you know, really solidified in the years following.
- So prior to that, I didn't really
- have a reason to talk about gay lifestyle or gay stuff except
- for Lambda Network.
- So it gave me an excuse to talk to my bosses.
- "Hey, I'm a leader in this network,
- This is what we're doing.
- Should we have a brown bag lunch session?
- Should we talk about this stuff in our building?
- Or would you allow me, you know, two hours off
- work to go down to Kodak Office and talk about it
- with a different group?"
- And oh, by the way, we're giving George Fisher an OUTSpoken
- and Visible Award, and I need to go down to George Fisher's
- office today.
- And you know, my managers are like,
- "Who's this kid who knows George Fisher?"
- (Laugh)
- Who has an appointment with George Fisher, no less?
- You know, so those are proud moments,
- and those are things that I'm proud of.
- One day I was in the research lab where
- I-- not my normal workplace.
- And the elevator stops on a floor,
- and the CEO of Kodak at the time, Dan Carp,
- gets into the elevator and he said, "Hello, Dan."
- He knew my name was Dan, because he'd
- been to our educational events, and he
- knew I was president of the Lambda Network at Kodak.
- So it's a proud moment that, hey.
- And all this work that I've done gets me professional--
- it really was.
- Professional recognition from the highest levels
- of the company.
- That is-- for me, that was proud.
- You know, how it plays out for other individuals at Kodak,
- probably not the same way.
- But some people probably had similar experiences.
- And-- you know?
- So I'm probably still known as one of the gay guys at Kodak.
- But that's a proud thing for me.
- EVELYN BAILEY: One final question.
- What is the current challenge that Lambda Network at Kodak
- faces, beside the--
- (Laugh)
- --obvious?
- DAN SAPPER: Survival.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Possible demise.
- I mean--
- DAN SAPPER: This is solely my personal take on it,
- and I think I'm largely correct.
- People are very concerned again about their career,
- about their longevity, about staying power with the company.
- They've made it.
- You know, Kodak has an aging workforce.
- They've made it a long way year-wise.
- They want their pension.
- They want their retirement.
- Kodak in bankruptcy, a lot of those things
- are in jeopardy right now.
- So I think there's a little bit of retrenchment
- from the gay population.
- We're not getting as much participation
- from the LGBT segment of the Kodak workers.
- They're putting their time in at work.
- They're not necessarily wanting to associate with the employee
- resource group.
- Whether that is because of aging out,
- that they're more comfortable with themselves,
- that they don't need the support network,
- that they're just focusing on their career,
- that things have gotten good enough at Kodak
- that they're not worried about being themselves at work,
- and therefore, that we don't need Kodak as much or Lambda
- as much.
- So I think there's all these challenges that are threatening
- to the survival of the Lambda Network
- because our key constituency is not making themselves known
- or availing themselves of the Network.
- We have a lot of allies who are interested in Lambda Network,
- and they are helping run Lambda Network.
- Our presidents for the past several years
- have not been gay people.
- They've been allies.
- So that is a challenge to us, that you know,
- do we need to reexamine our mission and our vision?
- Are we doing something wrong in the light of where
- Kodak is as a company today?
- And maybe it's time for a reassessment.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Thank you.
- Thank you for your insights, and thank you for your memory
- in remembering events and circumstances.
- DAN SAPPER: And it's fun to walk down that memory lane.
- That's actually-- while the tape is still going, there was a--
- without-- the Out & Equal New York Finger Lakes
- affiliate is now a group of groups like Lambda Network.
- And just last month, we had Chris Crespo from Ernst & Young
- came to town.
- And Chris Crespo is somebody who won the Out & Equal--
- and I forget what the award is called, whether it's
- the Trailblazer Award.
- But somebody who--
- EVELYN BAILEY: The Outie?
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah, it's the Outie Award
- for a gay individual who is most successful at promoting
- LGBT workplace equality.
- So Chris Crespo was here in town.
- She works for Ernst & Young, I think in the Pittsburgh region.
- And she said that one of the great things
- to do with an employee resource group
- is do a walk down memory lane.
- You know, get your group together.
- Get the memories going.
- You might have new discoveries.
- If nothing else, you'll remember some great old times.
- So I think that's where Lambda is right now.
- We need to do that.
- And this kind of conversation really
- helps me solidify some of those memories,
- and I think it's very valuable.
- So I appreciate you asking me.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Well, you're very welcome.
- And I will say on tape, and Kevin
- has heard me say this before, and other people have.
- If it were not for employee resource networks
- such as Lambda Network at Kodak, such as the network at Xerox,
- such is the network at--
- B&O, such is the network at Corning,
- all around this region, our political agenda
- and our social agenda would not be as advanced as it is.
- DAN SAPPER: Yes.
- EVELYN BAILEY: I believe that without
- the corporate leadership, we would be
- years from marriage equality.
- I believe without the corporate leadership,
- we would not have a GLSEN in this area serving our youth.
- There are so many things that I think
- would not have happened had those networks not been here.
- DAN SAPPER: Yeah.
- EVELYN BAILEY: And I say that deliberately,
- and I say it with a tremendous amount of passion,
- because that is what helps people grow and be out.
- And without visibility, we don't exist.
- And that's crucial, because our young people
- coming up and growing up, it's fine to have these movie and TV
- gurus.
- But they need to know and see that the history here
- has made it OK, has made it relatively safe
- to be a gay person.
- DAN SAPPER: Agreed 100%.
- And I think that resembles my journey very much.
- EVELYN BAILEY: Well, thank you, Dan.
- DAN SAPPER: Thank you, Evelyn.